I can’t. I saw a flamenco show yesterday and a woman beside me was wearing some intoxicating fragrance and it blew my mind! Next time I hope to find the courage to ask her what she was wearing. It was lovely!
I haven’t written much this summer. You see, I’ve been pretty well stuck on Chanel… Chanel’s high-end Eau de cologne as well as Pour Monsieur Eau de toilette and the corresponding Pour Monsieur Gel pour le bain et la douche. Also, Chanel’s No. 19 soap and the occasional shot of Givenchy III for evening drama. I’ve never had much luck with layering perfumes, but layering these components was absolutely brainless. One can’t POSSIBLY go wrong! And, I sometimes sprayed Guerlain’s Vetiver or Hermès’ Eau d’Orange Verte… both the All-over shampoo and the Eau de cologne.
I’ve tested so many perfumes over the past 4 years, it was nice to just wear things that I love! And in the summer, I got the added bonus of enjoying the bath products that give off beautiful, discreet scent off exposed skin. Using a high-end luxury soap doesn’t have the same impact in the dead of winter when you’re dressed like a polar bear!
I’ve been contacted recently by a couple of niche perfumers and they have offered sending samples, so I’m looking forward to testing their work. Maybe they’ll be able to dislodge me from my Chanel haze.
Last night’s flamenco show was superb… particularly because I discovered a “guitarrista flamenco” who was borderline genius, Alberto López. When I see this kind of talent from such a young person, I find it … well… as a friend would say, “troublant, très troublant.”
I’ll be back next week with a review.
Posted by Normand Cardella on September 14, 2014
Created by : Jacques Polge
Date : 1929/2007
Genre : Eau de cologne (best in class)
Concentration : eau de cologne
Chanel’s über-class Eau de Cologne was on my radar a very long time before I decided to spend the money to buy it. I knew it would be good… although I didn’t know that it would be THIS good! You see, I had tested a sample which I received from a mail order service several years ago and I remember it being perfection… but then I tucked that thought away in my memory and kept waiting for the right moment. I don’t know why I waited so long. I guess I got distracted.
According to the Chanel website, this 2007 version is Jacques Polge’s reinterpretation of the original of 1929. Then the marketing copy goes on to say… “The highest-quality citrus fruits have been used in the composition of this cheerful and dynamic Eau de Cologne. Mandarin Orange and Bergamot unite their zesty freshness with airy notes of Neroli. A generous and deliciously floral Cologne, for a radiant celebration of summer.” All of this is absolutely not true… or rather, it is true but highly understated. This is THE eau de cologne… every other eau de cologne which I have tested in the past pales in comparison except maybe Hermès’ Eau d’Orange Verte and the Guerlains (of course). Chanel’s bouquet of quality citrus oils composed of lemons, limes, and oranges literally dance around in the top and middle notes… it’s absolute perfection. The floral heart acts as an out-of-focus backdrop and the musk drydown smells cleaner than clean laundry. There is absolutely nothing bad I can say about this one. Even the timing is right… two to four hours, which is what one would expect from an eau de cologne.
I’ve been layering this one with Chanel’s Pour Monsieur Bath and Shower Gel. FiveoaksBouquet suggested it might go well with Chanel No. 19 soap and of course, she is so right. And you could add Pour Monsieur eau de toilette to it at the end of the day for an evening or Chanel No. 19… or No 5. In fact, I don’t think there is any Chanel product that couldn’t be added to that exquisite quality musk (probably Firmenich’s Muscone, according to Luca Turin).
Anyone can wear this one… men and women of all ages. It’s timeless.
So.. while trying to find an image of perfection, the “Let’s Face the Music and Dance” number from the movie Follow the Fleet (1936) came to mind featuring a quartet… Fred Astaire, Ginger Rogers, Irving Berlin for the music and Bernard Newman who designed the gown! When I think of perfection, I think of this number (even though the image is reversed, it is still perfect).
Posted by Normand Cardella on August 2, 2014
If you’ve read even only a few of my posts, you know that perfume classification is a pet subject of mine. I guess it’s the librarian in me which loves the challenge of creating a finite, controlled vocabulary which can describe everything in the perfume universe. I love Michael Edwards’ taxonomy but I’d like to think that I might come up with my own one day.
Marketing is something completely different, as is blogging. And so when I see new expressions to describe perfumes, they always grab my attention. Here’s to uncontrolled vocabularies which pique the curiosity and feed the soul!
Let’s look at a couple of great examples. Luca Turin describes Joy Parfum as a symphonic floral. Right! I get it. A symphony of flowers. And when Denyse Beaulieu described Estée Lauder’s Jasmine White Moss as a holographic chypre… YES!!! Lauder’s fragrance is a holograph of a chypre… a sort of olfactory “trompe l’oeil”! I guess that would be a “trompe nez”? (But then again, isn’t ALL of perfume an expression of trompe nez.)
In contrast, I once read that 31 rue Cambon was a chypre-less chypre! Ouch! Not very satisfying. Or how about Estée Lauder’s prismatic floral? That would be Beyond Paradise. Symphonic floral, I get. Prismatic floral? Not so much. But kudos to the Lauder marketing people for trying.
And very recently, I read on a little card next to Mugler’s Chyprissime, “deconstructed chypre”. I’m not sure I get this one either. What is a deconstructed chypre?
So let’s end this post with a trompe l’oeil of a trompe l’oeil. You see… people who attended the Alexander McQueen fall/winter fashion show of 2006 thought that they had just seen a moving hologram of Kate Moss. Well, the technology didn’t exist at the time (and still doesn’t) and so what they saw was a decidedly downmarket, low-tech trompe l’oeil trick of Victorian haunted houses called Pepper’s Ghost.
Although it’s not a hologram as we define a hologram today, it’s still very striking and impressive. (Thanks to Denyse of Grain de Musc who first brought this one to my attention).
Posted by Normand Cardella on May 26, 2014